The Future of Twitter - 10 Ways Twitter Will Change American Business - TIME

While there may be commercial value for using Twitter to communicate with customers, the danger is that the Twitter community could turn against a marketer viewed as being too crass by being relentlessly self-promoting. Twitter users have set up their own rules of conduct when using the service, not unlike those with MySpace and Facebook. These rules were not put together by Twitter itself, which mandates only rules of use. Like many social-network sites, Twitter is self-governed by its members, and companies must take that into account as they join the service.

Twitter is still in the early stages of developing a plan for making money as a company, but plenty of large corporations like Starbucks (SBUX) are already using it as a marketing tool. Twitter will probably evolve into both a community of individuals and a community of companies that provide goods and services for those individuals.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Minsh: the Tweetsphere as an Underwater Virtual World

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (2)
Posted 6 months ago

Ignite Cardiff Presentation - Lifestreaming

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Wikinomics» Four simple rules to keep Twitter useful

Responsible Twitter users abide by four simple rules:

1. You learn something new everyday
2. Twitter is not chat
3. Don’t be a needy jerk
4. Ignore rules 1 to 3 if you are in marketing

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

PR 2.0: Gazing into the Twitterverse

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (2)
Posted 6 months ago

Zensify: Your Social Life, Aggregated on the iPhone

Zensify, available today for the iPhone and iPod Touch, takes our chaotic social media-centric lives and conveniently displays everything from a smattering of top social sites all in one pocket-friendly feed. It’s essentially a lifestreaming service, a là FriendFeed (FriendFeed reviews), but made specifically for the mobile experience.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Are social networks destroying knowledge? « Laserlike

Can crowds remain wise in an increasingly socially connected world?

If informational cascades destroy knowledge and Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and the iPhone are essentially informational cascade services, aren’t we doomed?  How does PageRank survive in a world where more and more URLs are published and re-Tweeted through Twitter?

In day to day life, there are some things that are objective and others that are subjective.  When trying to find a restaurant or bar, most consumers are quite happy to have their social networks influence their decisions.  The number one feature of a bar is who else is there, so informational cascades might actually improve the experience.  And there is signal in social networks — friends are friends because they probably share common interests and values.  Their actions are almost certainly better signals for highly preferential things than the wisdom of a random crowd.  For fashion, games, movies, bars, gyms, salons and a host of other “subjective” things socially driven informational cascades have the potential to improve discovery.

For objective things, informational cascades have the potential to do great harm.  When people discuss their point of view on something before voting with their behavior, conformity will destroy knowledge.  Instead of picking the wrong line as in Asch’s experiment, stock prices get driven too high and then too low or false reports surface like the premature reports of Patrick Swayze’s death.

I wonder if the way people find things bifurcates into solutions for subjective things and solutions for objective things?  Might social networks like Twitter replace Google and Yahoo! on subjective discovery while the current incumbents retain the keepers of the global truth for objective topics?  Will someone use the social graph to sanitize information — that is, use the knowledge of who knows who to de-dupe amplified data and to kill informational cascades?

An interesting post about the relationship between social networks and knowledge

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Country Codes of the World

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Think streams…

An extract from the article of John Borthwick, The Rise Of Social Distribution Networks:

First and foremost what emerges out of this is a new metaphor — think streams vs. pages. This seems like an abstract difference but I think its very important.    Metaphors help us shape and structure our perspective, they serve as a foundation for how we map and what patterns we observe in the world.     In the initial design of the web reading and writing (editing) were given equal consideration - yet for fifteen years the primary metaphor of the web has been pages and reading.     The metaphors we used to circumscribe this possibility set were mostly drawn from books and architecture (pages, browser, sites etc.).    Most of these metaphors were static and one way.     The steam metaphor is fundamentally different.  Its dynamic, it doesnt live very well within a page and still very much evolving.    Figuring out where the stream metaphor came from is hard — my sense is that it emerged out of RSS.    RSS introduced us to the concept of the web data as a stream — RSS itself became part of the delivery infrastructure but the metaphor it introduced us to is becoming an important part of our everyday lives.

A stream.   A real time, flowing, dynamic stream of  information — that we as users and participants can dip in and out of and whether we participate in them or simply observe we are are a part of this flow.     Stowe Boyd talks about this as the web as flow: “the first glimmers of a web that isnt about pages and browsers” (see this video interview,  view section 6 –> 7.50 mins in).      

This world of flow, of streams, contains a very different possibility set to the world of pages.   Among other things it changes how we perceive needs.  Overload isnt a problem anymore since we have no choice but to acknowledge that we cant wade through all this information.   This isnt an inbox we have to empty,  or a page we have to get to the bottom of — its a flow of data that we can dip into at will but we cant attempt to gain an all encompassing view of it.    

Dave Winer put it this way in a conversation over lunch about a year ago.    He said “think about Twitter as a rope of information — at the outset you assume you can hold on to the rope.  That you can read all the posts, handle all the replies and use Twitter as a communications tool, similar to IM — then at some point, as the number of people you follow and follow you rises — your hands begin to burn. You realize you cant hold the rope you need to just let go and observe the rope”.      

Over at Facebook Zuckerberg started by framing the flow of user data as a news feed — a direct reference to RSS — but more recently he shifted to talk about it as a stream: “… a continuous stream of information that delivers a deeper understanding for everyone participating in it. As this happens, people will no longer come to Facebook to consume a particular piece or type of content, but to consume and participate in the stream itself.”    I have to finish up this section on the stream metaphor with a quote from Steve Gillmor.    He is talking about a new version of Friendfeed, but more generally he is talking about real time streams.     The content and the language — this stuff is stirring souls.

We’re seeing a new Beatles emerging in this new morning of creativity, a series of devices and software constructs that empower us with both the personal meaning of our lives and the intuitive combinations of serendipity and found material and the sturdiness that only rigorous practice brings. The ideas and sculpture, the rendering of this supple brine, we’ll stand in awe of it as it is polished to a sparkling sheen. (full article here)



Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Teens practices

danah boyd has been taking parental questions about teens' use of the net on Twitter.

Here some interesting answers:

@AlterSeekers: According to Facebook Era, Teens see email as a "work" tool and prefer to Facebook message. Is this true among these teens?

I was surprised to find that email is deader than ever among teens. As more of their parents and teachers are getting on Facebook (or MySpace), they see little reason to email with anyone. Thus, email is increasingly needed for having an account on various sites and for getting access to or sending attachments. But even when teens do use email for "work", they do not use it for social purposes.

@mirroredpool: What borders to teens place of social networking sites and education? How would they react to using an SNS to do class work?

@annejonas: i'm curious if they want schools involved in social networks or if they like it as a social space outside the realm of formal edu.

This is messy. Many teens have ZERO interest in interacting with teachers on social network sites, but there are also quite a few who are interested in interacting with SOME teachers there. Still, this is primarily a social space and their interactions with teachers are primarily to get more general advice and help. In some ways, its biggest asset in the classroom is the way in which its not a classroom tool and not loaded this way. Given that teens don't Friend all of their classmates, there are major issues in terms of using this for groupwork because of boundary issues.

@shcdean: What future do they see for FB or Twitter.

They don't use Twitter. When asked, teens always say that they'll use their preferred social network site (or social media service) FOREVER as a sign of their passion for it now. If they expect that they'll "grow out of it", it's a sign that the service is waning among that group at this very moment. So they're not a good predictor of their own future usage.

@andrewmiller: how does having a smartphone change their interactions w/each other on SNS? more photos/videos? faster rumors? have/have-not gap?

A gap is definitely occurring. A smart phone means more more more more more - more SMS, more web consumption, more status updates, more photos, etc. Certain smart phones are desperately desired items. That said, teens are also doing quite well with the iPod Touch + wifi as an alternative. Smart phones are helping them stay more engaged and connected.

@harraton: Do they care about their privacy?

VERY much so. But what constitutes privacy for them is often quite different than what constitutes privacy for adults. Privacy is not dead.

What's about Twitter? average teens don't use Twitter. They may in the future, but they do not now. Those who do are early adopters and not representative of any mainstream teen practice. Because of Oprah and celebs, some teens are starting to hear about it, but they don't understand it and they aren't using it.

Loading mentions Retweet
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago